Home » The Good, Bad and Ugly about GMOs

The Good, Bad and Ugly about GMOs

The Good, Bad and Ugly About GMOs

There is a growing amount of information about GMOs in recent years that, (genetically modified organisms), appear to confirm serious health and environmental implications due to these ‘novel’ foods.

With that mounting evidence that GMOs may pose a risk, we ask the question: Are GMO foods the next best hope for feeding our planet, or should we follow the example set by consumers in the European Union? The EU voiced an outcry about GMOs which reached such proportions that, in April 1999, virtually all major manufacturers publicly committed to stop using genetically modified ingredients in their European brands.

But on the other side of the GMO debate, there stands proponents that represent big agriculture and chemical industries that tout the overwhelming benefits of GM foods. Are their assertions and claims have any basis that GMOs are completely safe, or is it simply just hype?

Let’s dig a little deeper and take a close look at both sides of the GMO issue and let you decide.

The Case for GMOs

According to the GMO industry, there are many good reasons to use GMOs:

  • Reduced need for herbicides
  • Reduced need of pesticides
  • Reduced greenhouse emissions as GMOs require less tillage or plowing, thus less use of fossil fuels
  • Ability to manipulate foods to increase desirable components such as nutrients
  • Increased production of food for starving third world countries.

These are certainly worthwhile goals, and humans have been successfully modifying the genetics of their food supply for centuries.

The supporters assert that over a trillion GMO meals have been eaten, thus proving their safety. The problem, of course, is that the new technology is far different from the hybridization and selection methods used in the past.

The big question: “Are GMOs safe?

The European Union Consumer-Led Revolt

The EU consumer-led revolt against GMOs was triggered in February 1999 when media coverage exploded after top GMO safety researcher, Dr. Arpad Pusztai was called to speak before Parliament and went public with some very alarming research results.

Dr. Pusztai, a highly respected leader in the field with 35 years employment at the Rowett Institute in Scotland, had been given a UK government grant to design the long-term testing protocols that were supposed to be part of the European GM food safety assessment process. When Pusztai fed rats genetically modified (GM) potatoes to produce a supposedly safe insecticide called the GNA lectin, all the animals showed pre-cancerous cell growths, smaller brains, livers and testicles, partially atrophied livers, and damaged to the immune system–with most changes appearing after just 10 days.

Since other rats fed normal potatoes spiked with GNA lectin–even 700 times more GNA lectin than was present in the GM potatoes–did not develop these problems, Pusztai’s results indicated that the problem lay with genetic engineering process itself. And that meant that all GM foods created from the same process, including those already on the market, might produce unintended ill effects.

What happens when researchers step forward with their findings?

According to Pusztai, when he expressed his concerns about GMO foods, he was fired and threatened with a lawsuit if he discussed his research. His 20-member research team was disbanded; the testing protocols were dropped, and a campaign was begun by pro-GM forces to discredit the study. Then an invitation to testify before Parliament allowed Pusztai to tell his story, and all hell broke loose. By April 1999, the protests of informed consumers had convinced manufacturers that GMOs would not sell in the EU, and all agreed to keep GMOs out of their European products, in spite of official approvals by a pro-GM European Commission.

Americans Ill-Informed about GMOs

In the U.S., the Pusztai story got virtually no press, and the U.S. mainstream media has failed to discuss other data suggesting GM foods may pose enormous health risks, including:

  • A preliminary study from the Russian National Academy of Sciences finding that more than half the offspring of mother rats fed GM soy died within three weeks (compared to 9% from mothers fed natural soy).
  • The estimated 10,000 sheep that died in India within 5-7 days of grazing on GM cotton plants engineered to produce their own Bt-toxin pesticide.
  • The only human GM feeding study ever published, which shows that the foreign genes inserted into GM food crops can transfer into the DNA of our gut bacteria. This study gives new meaning to the adage, “You are what you eat.” Long after those GM corn chips you munched are history, your intestinal flora may still be churning out the “Bt” pesticide GM corn plants have been engineered to produce.

What agencies oversee GMO production and testing?

U.S. consumers mistakenly believe that, unless the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) had approved each and every GM food through rigorous, well designed, long-term studies, GM food ingredients would not be allowed in our food supply and certainly could not be omnipresent in prepared foods in the form of corn, soy, cottonseed and canola derivatives.

The reality is that the FDA has absolutely no GMO safety testing requirements, and GM ingredients are found in almost all prepared foods that line the grocery shelves in the stores. Unless a processed food contains only organic ingredients, it is highly likely to contain GM ingredients.

Again, no agency oversees or tests GMOs, and because of this, the “research” that supports GMO safety isn’t mandated by any agencies or US government, and the information that may be given is done so in a voluntary basis by the very companies that produce their own GM crops and foods, which has been described by critics as “meticulously designed to avoid finding problems”.

Further down the FDA rabbithole

What’s most astounding is the 44,000 FDA internal documents later made public as a result of a lawsuit revealed problems with GMOs, and the overwhelming consensus among the FDA’s scientists was that GM foods were “substantively different”, so different that their consumption might result in unpredictable and hard-to-detect allergens, toxins, new diseases and nutritional problems. Agency scientists urged superiors to require long-term studies, but were not only ignored, their statements about possible negative effects of GMOs were progressively deleted from FDA policy statement drafts. Evidence of this FDA activity was presented at a Washington, D.C., press conference in 1999, another story major media didn’t publicize.

The same companies that carefully avoid including GM ingredients in their European products are feeding GMOs to ill-informed consumers in the US. Most Americans know so little about GMOs that, although virtually all of us have now, albeit unwittingly, eat GMO foods the vast majority of processed foods contain derivatives from the four major GM crops: soy, corn, cottonseed and canola, only about 1 in 4 realize it.

How are GMOs created?

The way GMOs are created disrupts the plant’s DNA in unintended, potentially harmful ways. In genetic engineering, a single gene is removed from one organism and forcibly inserted into another. First, scientists identify the gene they want and analyze its sequence. (If the source gene is to be taken from bacteria, some of its sequence has to be rearranged because bacteria produce certain amino acids using a code different from the one used by plants).

After figuring out a working gene sequence, engineers add a promoter sequence at one end of the gene to turn it on (the most popular one in GM crops being CaMV 35S, which forces the gene to constantly churn out the protein), and a terminator sequence at the other end (which tells the DNA to stop). Lastly, scientists add a marker gene, usually one that confers antibiotic resistance, so they can later douse the plant cells with antibiotics, killing off normal cells and revealing those that have been genetically modified. This combination of gene sequences – called a “gene cassette” – is then multiplied into millions and inserted into target plant cells via one of two primary methods, both of which trigger a wound response the cell.

Other methods of GMO insertion

One method employs a bacterium (Agrobacterium tumefaciens), which normally infects a plant by inserting a portion of its own DNA into the plant’s DNA and then causing the plant to produce tumors. Genetic engineers remove the tumor-creating section of this bacterium’s DNA and replace it with the desired gene cassette, so the bacterium “infects” the plants with the foreign genes instead.

The second method uses a gene gun. Scientists coat millions of particles of tungsten or gold with gene cassettes and blast them into millions of plant cells, only a few of which incorporate the foreign gene cassette.

In either of the two delivery forms, the next step is the application of the antibiotic to which the gene cassette confers resistance. Most of the plant cells die, but a few – the ones in which the transgene has inserted – survive. These are developed into plants that researchers can duplicate by making clones through tissue culture or harvesting the seeds.

Each plant grown from a gene insertion is unique because where the transgene ends up integrating itself into the host DNA is uncontrolled and cannot be reproduced. For this reason, the possible consequences to the plant’s DNA are different with each insertion, so all plants developed from a specific insertion are collectively referred to as an “event.”

In sum, genetic engineering artificially combines genes from different species and forcibly inserts them into unknown and random locations on the host genome. The procedure, which disrupts the precise orchestration of thousands of genes that has evolved over millennia in the normal plant’s genome, is highly mutagenic. We now know that genes, like nutrients, do not work singularly, but as part of highly integrated networks. Plus it introduces bacterial genes for drug resistance along with strong promoters to express the foreign proteins at high levels in all parts of the plant.

How to Go Non-GMO

  • Organic foods are not allowed to contain GM ingredients. Even the small percentage of non-organic ingredients allowed in foods labeled organic is not allowed to contain GMOs.
  • If you are traveling to Europe, no worries, GMOs are banned in EU foods. In the United States and Canada, however, GM foods are not only legal, but are unlabeled, so avoiding them can be challenging.
  • Carefully read the label if purchasing prepared or processed foods, vitamins, prepared or processed foods to make sure the main food additives are not included, such as soy, corn and their derivatives.
  • Most generic vegetable oils and margarines used in restaurants and in processed foods in North America are made from soy, corn, canola, or cottonseed—the four major genetically engineered crops. Avoid these oils, unless they are organic or labeled non-GMO. Choose any other oil, e.g., olive, sunflower, or safflower.
  • Check the list of ingredients for GM enzymes, additives, sweeteners, soy and/or corn derivatives. Genetically modified bacteria and fungi are used in the production of enzymes, vitamins, food additives, flavorings and processing agents in thousands of foods on the grocery shelves as well as health supplements.
  • Flavorings such as vanillin and hydrolyzed vegetable protein, which is derived from corn and soy, can also come from GM sources. Xanthan gum is another product that may be derived from a GM process.
  • Aspartame, the diet sweetener, is a product of genetic engineering.
  • Honey can be produced from GM crops. For example, some Canadian honey comes from bees collecting nectar from canola. This has shut down exports of Canadian honey to Europe.

Conclusion

What the production of GMO crops and foods points to is a product that has zero accountability, zero safety testing by the very agencies that are supposed to keep the public from harm, and the immeasurable unintended negative consequences that GMO possess.

Except for organic foods, the entire American food supply has been systematically hijacked by chemical companies, not bent on trying to feed the world; not providing healthy alternatives, but rather for profits that they reap from the chemicals that are used by thousands of farmers that grow GMO crops.

These chemical companies have essentially created a destructive product, from the degradation of microorganisms in the soil, to the food we buy and eat.  Perhaps only in decades to come will we ever be able to reverse the damage that GMOs have caused. In fact, unless GMOs and this technology isn’t kept in check, the very existence of all species of living beings and our planet may be in jeopardy for many future generations to come.

References: 





  • Gene Franco

    Why are GMO products still allowed on the market?!?!

    You would think this is something our leaders would make a top priority.

    I can’t believe what our country has become!

  • Quinn Wendland

    GMO products are still allowed on the market, because contrary to your backwater beliefs, they are heavily tested and are healthy.

  • kels

    who is the author of this article? i cant find the information

  • greatgaul

    A lot of “information” is presented here, as if it is the gospel truth. In reality, not a single sheep has ever died because it ate Bt cotton plant material. If it were true, Bt cotton wouldnt occupy millions of hectares in india, with nothing to prevent animal entry or consumption. If sheep were dying, Bt cotton would simply be dying too. To make fiction appear as fact, you use confidence phrases such as “But of course” preceding your statements. Remember one thing. All the people cannot be fooled all the time.

  • jawzome

    about us

  • Fernanda Hernandez

    GMOs that have been studied are only studied by the corporations that created and many (almost all) of the times the studies are faked they put in lies please do your research correctly before you say they are healthy because they are not healthy at all.

  • Quinn Wendland

    Where did you get this conspiracy crap? Have you heard of the FDA? Why do you think they are faked? Provide any evidence and I might listen to you, but you have none and you didn’t do any background research.

  • Roxanne610

    Watch the Movie Bought then let’s see how you believe. Our Country is all about money and could care less about the health of Americans!!!!! Don’t be fooled

  • Roxanne610

    The exact truth!!!

  • Quinn Wendland

    One conspiracy movie does not display anything. If our country was about the money, we would have no factory jobs, and no health care. What are you 8!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

  • Savannahbbbb

    is that why they are banned inalot of other countries

  • Quinn Wendland

    Name one.

  • Sebi

    whos the publisher and the author. I cant find them

  • The USDA gets 5% profit from some organizations selling genetically modified seeds. So in all honesty it is possible that big businesses are paying off government agencies. RiceTec, for example, patented GM seeds with the name Basmati. This means those Indian farmers who have grown this crop for thousands of years could be sued for thousands of dollars. Some American organizations are monopolizing the seed trade and destroying diversity among seeds. Pollen can actually ravel to organic farms and cause cross-contamination and companies like Monsanto, which controls the majority of global gmo seed trade, can sue these farms for stealing their product. In reality the farmers don’t want this and are actually scared to speak up about it because they could lose everything. There is corruption somewhere throughout all of this. Its not all conspiracy.

  • Quinn Wendland

    Seriously? I don’t care about the corruption of a company. My point is that GMO’s are healthy.

  • Quinn Wendland

    Oh, I’m sorry, I used a period, it that to much for you?

  • http://naturalrevolution.org/ Natural Revolution

    There are over 60 countries that have banned or restrict GMOs.

    http://www.gmo-free-regions.org/gmo-free-regions.html

  • Quinn Wendland

    restricted* And those countries are only doing it because of the money lost from their farmers, not because they are unsafe.

  • Professor Funk

    Dude, must you be so sarcastic? There is cause for concern when an industry is charged with conducting it’s own safety research and when the main regulatory agency (FDA) declares that GMO food is “substantially equivalent” despite the views of its own employees. Allow science to decide with proper, independent field studies, including to guage long term environmental, health effects. BTW, this article could use a serious second edit!

  • Quinn Wendland

    Every industry conducts it’s own safety research, otherwise it would take forever for them to release products, it is also a serious problem when the FDA has crazy people in it.

  • Terrance Bacchus

    Your really stupid… I dont really feel like arguing with a narrow minded person that has no critical thinking skills but ill say a few things. It is banned in europe if not highly restricted from most GMOS. Second the same people who claim its safe are the one who profit from its sales. Third when it comes to statistics of being the healthiest/unhealthiest country in the world America is one of the most unhealthiest with cancer diabetes and many cardiovascular diseases on a rise. Or is that just a coincidence that GMO’s is the most significant in this part of the world.. I dont care about your conspiracy bullshit word made up from disinformationist to debunk people who see the bigger picture. The government is not looking out for you and when you realize that you will see things a bit more clearly. If GMO’s is so healthy why doesnt monsato promote it through the media? If its soo good for you wouldnt they want to stand behind there product?… Why are they spending millions to keep it unlabeled and out of the public eye? Because when people are more informed then people will see how detrimental to our health it is. And thats where the bigger picture comes in.. Depopulation.

  • Quinn Wendland

    You’re* are* more unhealthy* so* This is the deal idiot. They are healthy. The government verified this. Americans are fat not because they eat GMO corn, but because they eat frickin fatty foods. Mexico is approaching America in this because of the fatty foods they now have access to. The reason they want it unlabeled is because of crazy people like you, and they are not spending millions. When was the last time you saw a food ad that wasn’t for a GMO based food? They are advertising it every time you look at any food that isn’t labeled organic. If you think the government isn’t looking out for you, get the fuck off the roads they pave, and don’t drink the water they test and put fluorine in so your teeth are better. Don’t go to school and take away your education. Don’t go to church, since they pay taxes; in fact, don’t go to your job since they are at least partially funded by the government. My conspiracy bullshit? You don’t believe in the fucking government. If the world’s population was cut in half by depopulation, at least I might not have to deal with you anymore.

  • http://naturalrevolution.org/ Natural Revolution

    Sadly, you’re misinformed about a plethora of information regarding the adversities of GMOs and the chemicals that are used to grow them.

    If GMO were a safe crop and yielded more than conventionally grown crops, the world would embrace this technology, but rather, the world has condemned this insidious technology and have banned GMOs in over 60 countries. The common thread is study after study of their toxicity to all life on the planet, from microorganisms in the soil, to animals who’ve all experienced tumors and other diseases fed exclusively GMO foods such as Bt corn and GMO potatoes.

    Are you not aware of the inherent damage that DNA go through when subjected to ‘gene splicing’? Do you not understand the overwhelming peer reviewed studies that have shown just how toxic these “federally untested and unregulated” crops are within almost all processed foods lining the grocery shelves in the US?

    Have you not read the entire article? Have you not read the studies that have concluded that GMOs and the chemicals that are used to grow them are inherently harmful? http://naturalrevolution.org/gmo-resources/scientific-research/

    It seems rather obvious that you don’t really care about GMOs, but rather, are a minion of Monsanto and its subsidiaries and the propaganda they push. Your assertions are erroneous by stating that GMOs are safe, and seemingly base your assertions upon conjecture instead of facts, and espouse talking points that insult others on this discussion with petty personal attacks. When people don’t have facts, they usually all resort to name calling.

    What I’d be more interested in, is exactly where you get your information; website, study, research article, etc.? This would be a pragmatic place to start, if you’re at all willing to back up your claims.

  • Stan

    But it would appear that most of them can be fooled all the time, and you are nicely contributing to it. I’m not sure what you have to gain from turning a blind eye to so many disturbing facts surrounding GMOs that anyone who does a small amount of research can find but I suppose if it helps you sleep soundly at night pretending Monsanto isn’t poisoning us daily to help their bottom line, then who am I to deny you that.

  • schmert

    who is the author? where are the facts or studies? why is this so secret as to who made it? And lastly, why is a reference a blog?

  • TheLordOfTheFlies

    ‘The Royal Society of Medicine declared that Pusztanis’ study “is flawed in many aspects of design, execution
    and analysis’ and that ‘no conclusions should be drawn from it”. For example, too few rats per test group were used to derive meaningful, statistically significant data.’
    Why bother quoting a disgraced scientist who only published his invalid finding to promote scaremongering like this, if you aren’t going to read up on how said findings were proven completely false!

  • TheLordOfTheFlies

    Oh gods! I’ve only just noticed that one of the sources was a blog!! And here’s me thinking it was a serious article! Damn you guys are fucking stupid. Makes me glad I’m not American.

  • TheLordOfTheFlies

    “In fact, unless GMOs and this technology isn’t kept in check, the very
    existence of all species of living beings and our planet may be in
    jeopardy for many future generations to come.”
    BAHAHAHA THIS IS JUST LAUGHABLE, ARE YOU GUYS EVEN TRYING!?!?!?

  • Greyson

    I just have to say organic means carbon based life form so GMO veggies technically can be labeled organic.The root word should be heirloom… now how they’re grown, pesticides and fertilized, should be labeled separate

  • Maimee

    too*

  • Quinn Wendland

    you didn’t mention the it that should have been an is, you failed the test.

  • Jacob Boeser

    Quinn must work for the scientists who create this poison. In each one of your arguments you have failed to give any viable evidence that GMO’s are “healthy”. People like you are the reason why america is ignorant, fat, and close minded. That you believe that what you see on TV MUST be true and what the government tells you. GMO’s are flat out unhealthy. Why do you think we have “organic food”. The organic food used to be what we actually eat. But, since monsanto poisoned our nation and genetically modified our food, that is considered the normal food. Thus, the normal food back then was kicked out of there label as “normal food” and labeled as “organic food”. The fact that you believe that GMO’s are healthy is just flat out ignorance.

  • Christina

    Why do people believe this article. Try reading something that has some real factors and information. Don’t let this deter you from GMO products. They’re better and safer than “organic” foods. If you don’t believe me, research it yourself. And in case you missed it, their sources for this article are very unreliable. This article is on a natural revolution organization website. Of course they will force feed you lies to make you buy into their agenda. Read something with some science behind it people.

  • Freeman Brown

    When we run out of food because all of you liberal Obama lovers don’t want GM crops grown don’t go crying that you are hungry. With the population growing every minute the only way to feed everyone in the future will be to grow GM crops and increase yields in harvest. All of you all against it, DONT EAT IT, oh and how many people have died from eating GM crops???

  • Schmert

    GUYS LOOK AT THE REFERENCES!!!!!! ONE OF THEM WAS A BLOG FOR CHRIST SAKE!!! STOP ARGUING OVER THIS, NOBODY EVEN KNOWS WHO THE AUTHOR IS!!! Ask yourself, why doesn’t the author want to share their name??? maybe because you need to look at the references, there are no real studies proving them right. It is all biased information for all we know, guys. Stop arguing over information that for all we know could be false and biased…….. There is no studies in this article to prove to me any of this is right. Unless this person proved that they worked there, I won’t buy any of it, which brings me back to the original question I had originally asked. Who is this author????

  • Dfjask

    GM crops do not increase yield. 80% of GM crops are herbicide resistant. GM crops are not meant to increase yield, they are meant to make money. If Monsanto actually was for the benefit of people, then why would they add a self-destruct mechanism that kills the plant so the farmer has to buy new seeds every year?

  • Dfjask

    Also, have you even read the blog?

  • FoodGeek

    Quinn this is why there is no labeling or safety requirements. The same people that are supposed to be protecting our food supply are working for the very companies controlling it.

  • Quinn Wendland

    except there are safety requirements.

  • jacob boeser

    Clearly you haven’t seen the food documentary food, lnc. people don’t die from the GM ingredients themselves you idiot. People die from the ingredients forming with the natural ingredients scientists didn’t take out. Since every one’s immune system is different, some people can fight off the alien compounds while others cant. In result, some people can get cancer and die. Do more reseach.

  • Michaelangelo

    There is more evidence supporting the fact that GMO crops harm the environment, other plants, animals, and even YOU!!! So if I were you, I would do a little more research and check your sources.

  • Jerry mores

    That’s pretty stupid of you. How do you know he is an American? Nothing because you’re ignorant.

  • subduedjoy

    When food is modified to become hardier, it is easier to grow. It is stronger. It can resist elements that would otherwise cause it to break down and succumb. But this also makes the newly improved food harder to digest. There was a time I would not have believed you if you told me that one day I would not be able to eat corn. Well. That day has come. My body starts attacking itself when I eat food containing modern corn, and modern corn is in everything. If you want to do your experiments, fine. But what gives anyone the right to use my body as a test subject?